A searchable audio archive from the 2013-2016 legislative sessions of the North Carolina General Assembly.

searching for

Reliance on Information Posted The information presented on or through the website is made available solely for general information purposes. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. We disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on such materials by you or any other visitor to the Website, or by anyone who may be informed of any of its contents. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.

House | August 20, 2015 | Chamber | House Session

Full MP3 Audio File

Members will take their seats, visitors will retire from the chamber. The sergeant at Arms will close the doors. Members and visitors are asked to please silence all electronic device. This morning's prayer will be offered by representative Meyer. We ask that all members rise as well as our guest in the gallery and their folks remain standing for the pledge of allegiance say after the prayer representative Mayer. Thank you Mr. Speaker this is a prayer authored by the Reverend Shell[sp? Oh, God, our help in ages past, we recognize that you alone are our hope for the years to come, we invoke your guidance with our task to offer mercy and fairness towards all humanity as you will offer mercy to us as North Carolina's leaders and servants. Help us to remember the poor in spirit and those who mourn without a voice to speak, engage us to remember that we as leaders are the voices for a changing world. Oh God you are unchanging, yet you have been the God of our ancestors their help in ages past. You alone are the same God who will direct, guide and lead us. help us to remember the tasks at hand for a changing world. Teach us to set aside differences, challenge us to be more merciful, engage us to remember the real needs of a changing world as you have always done and provided for through your earthly servants. Oh God continue to display upon us mercy as we show mercy towards other lest we forget the real task at hand. Guide our task as servant leaders are daunting at times but as we invoke your guidance to uphold justice and equality, we believe you shall be here with us because you are the God of justice. Help us to remember the tasks at hand for a changing world. Oh God, our help in ages past you are our hope for years to come, you are our shelter from the stormy blast and you will be our eternal home. As we, your leaders remember the test at hand for a changing world, it is in your name we offer this prayer to you, the only holy one, the only wise one, our redeemer and our God of justice for humanity Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. The gentleman from Harnett, Representative Lewis is recognized for a motion. Mr. Speaker, the Journal for August 19th has been examined and found to be correct. I move that it stands approved as written. Representative Louise may you address the journal for August 19th be as written. Those in favor will say aye Aye Those opposed no the Ayes have it, the Journal is approved as written. The ratification of bills and resolutions, the Clerk will read. The Enrolling Clerk reports the following bills duly ratified file for representation the governor senate bill 446 an act to revive for the uniform treatment of franchise own a vehicles to clarify the agents or agencies of the state of political sub division of the state shall have authority to control, operate and named aqueous upon approve of the state chief information officer to modify regulate or amend aqueous systems to conform guidelines to authorize Rosewell County to regulate navigable waters within these boundaries. Chapter bills will be noted. Chair appoints these additional conferees to house bill 372 Representative Bert Jones, and Representative Brisson as additional conferees to that committee. Somebody represented by Calendar Senator bill 15 Clerk will read. Representative Rachael senator Rachael senate bill 15 a bill to be entitled an act to make changes to down problem insurance laws and to recommend by the joint legislative oversight committee on unemployment insurance and to form partners for the cote of bill general Assembly North Carolina enac. What purpose does the lady from Davie representative Howard rise? To debate the bill Thank you Mr. Speaker, we had a good debate on this bill last I think it was the end of last week and I would just hope that we will continue to support the legislation For what purpose does the gentleman from Ashe Representative Jordan rise? To send forth an amendment, debate the amendment. The gentleman is recognized to send forth The clerk will read. Representative Jordan moves to amend the bill on page three, lines 25 by deleting five and substituting three. The gentleman from Ashe has the floor to debate the amendment.  Thank you Mr. Speaker I hope that people realize that, I don't usually stand up unless there's a reason for it.

And I'm amendment for particular reasons, there been passed bills, I have allowed the train to leave the station, when I had what seemed to be a small concern that bill and it turns out to be a bigger concern later on. So I've determined that I'm going to start standing up when I see those small issues I'm doing this cause I think it's very important, certainly with the amount of respect I have for the bill sponsor. My amendment here is changing the number of contacts that we have page three, line 25, we had a big discussion last week. And to continue the train analogy, I'm afraid both sides were off track completely talking about this issue. It's not an issue of are there enough job contacts being made, or there're too many being made by the person in order to get their employment. The issue here is it's truly, it's an administrative technicality and it needs to be three and not five. The number five came from the head of DES. And, he's walked that back after considering the impact on employers in North Carolina. He walked it back and said it needs to be three and to match 44 other states in the Federal Department of Labor. For rule making purposes the DES could add more contacts later on in the details if they wanted to. If you look at the language in the bill it says at least three or five depending on which which version it is. This is going to be a tremendous burden to employers if we put five in there. It doesn't match most other states and we already heard members of both side just stand up and talk about how people come in to get applications for jobs that they really don't have any qualifications on wasting everyone's time. Members of both side have mentioned as an issue. Another initial issue by the senate not wanting any changes to this. We did have a number of people who voted against this, I think with this amendment we actually could have a unanimous vote, I would hope that will the Senate that this is important. They need just to concur and go on with this dying motion and working for three years and that's the deal with the Governor I really think it is important. We are going to have a problem around about December I believe if we don't change this to three if we leave it at five. So, with the risk assuming to be too picky I really hope you will support this bill change it to three and it has nothing to do with the number we have already fixed the issue of unemployment by lowering the rate and lowering the time that you can get an employment that will take care of people taking jobs, thank you Mr. Speaker. For what purpose does the lady from Davy representative Howard rise? To speak on the amendment Mr. Speaker. The lady has the floor to debate the amendment I've been here a long time and the most abusive thing that you continue to hear in this chamber is, well, the senate won't do this or that. This is the way the senate wants it, and we have have to do certain things because this is the senate dictating. But let me tell you on this one bill, they have sent a very clear message, we have worked on this senate bill 15 for months. It came in passed the senate it came over, it went up to rules. It was in rules for several months, representative Lewis worked with Senator Rucho and all of the recommendations and if you have a copy of your bill, if you pull it up you're going to see there's some very serious things that incorporated in this bill. Some of the things that our department has been doing over the last two years, and I don't want to use the word not legal but it's not [xx] and all of the things that they are covering in this bill will rectify those things that are in question. The senate stood [xx] the bill sponsor stood  in this chamber day before yesterday and I appreciate representative Jordan, but I ask him to turn and speak to the senator, they are through with this bill. they are done, but they are not going to go conference with. If we have vote for them, then I'm not going to find their amendment I'm going to say that thought vote of conscience as representative Jordan said and I had great respect for him, it's nitpicking, that's what it is, it's nitpicking taken, and on a normal day, I would say, "let it go"

we go to conference with it and somebody will work it out, but this issue is bigger than this amendment. I'm going to ask you to vote no in respect the senator Rachael's request there has been hours and hours of time put in to correcting what was broken over there. We fixed it, we paid the debt, we're headed in the right direction with the reserve count everything is headed in the right direction. The secretary asked for five more to go. If he has changed his mind I think with the Speaker I hope we'll continue to have the Oversight Committee, there're still tweaks and changes that occur everyday. Another member brought me a question just last week and said what about this? I said well it hasn't been addressed. It is forever changing but it is something that we need to stay the course and if this bill stops today because of this amendment, and there may be two or three, I don't know, that matter, if is one bring them on, bring them all on. The Senate is not going to move any further, they have been very be firm about it. I ask you with all due respect to vote No on this amendment and let's get it fixed this time, and moving on and then the oversight committee, which is three members from the minority party and three members from the majority party can sit again and work through all of the problems that we've had with the Division of Unemployment. I ask you to vote No. For what purpose does gentleman from Mecklenburg, Representative Bradford rise?   Debate the amendment.   The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment. So I first want to thank Representative Jordan for the amendment, but I do want to offer a slightly different perspective. I'm certain that I'm not the only job creator or employer in this room, but I have an example to share with you that's very real and very relevant. I own a company that has 40 W2 employees, my company continues to grow, and I have  three job openings for the last 90 days because I've had to [xx] people for non performance, people who have now sort and won unemployment which is a whole. So I have three job openings that have salary packages of around $40, 000. Now this men earn $100, 000 paying jobs, but they're not at $15, 000 jobs either. We have posted job openings on places like Indeed, monster, Craig list, looking for people. Do you know how many applicants who are unemployment have come seeking work at my company? Zero zero, so I'm an employer. I am not bothered by anyone who's unemployment seeking for employment, I welcome it in fact the more the merrier. The more applicants I have for a job the better chance I'm going to get the quality person that I want for my organization. I do not do this as an injustice to make the requirement five. I think it's extremely reasonable on the type of age of technology that we live in. People who're unemployment essentially just left or was terminated or for whatever reason no longer have a job than which they were required to go somewhere five days a week and now we're asking them to make five job contexts at their own will, at their own speed, their own pace. It could be five in one day, it could be one day for five to straight days, it doesn't matter they have that autonomy, what's the big deal. I encourage you to vote against the amendment, I think it's common sense and as an employer please bother me a lot because I'm hiring. For what purpose does the gentleman from Craven, Representative Speciale rise? Speak on the amendment. The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment. This is a no brainier here we're giving money to people that are unemployment and we're asking them one time at least one per day to talk to an employer. Short of telling them you

can sleep all week how much easier can it get it's not unreasonable to say one employer per day. The reality is that people that are unemployment should be looking eight hours a day, five days week trying to gain employment I mean that's the reality, that's how it used to be done, but a lot of folks, there are a lot of folks out there regain the system, and there're some folks, I have been in a position where I have heard people and ones I told them we've got the job, I will come back in an hour, here's the uniform to put on to back an hour I never hear from him again. They didn't want the job, they just wanted to fulfill their commitment to get there. I get it, I get that that's going to happen on occasion but you know what, one job per day, one employer per day that's hardly putting a burden on the ones that are getting cheques to help them survive. It's not a burden it's something we should have done a long time ago, one per day ladies and gentlemen, please defeat the amendment. For what purpose does the gentleman from Wake Representative Stam rise Speak on the amendment. The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment. For the reasons mentioned by Representative Jordan, I support his amendment as an employer. I support his amendment this is a very important bill. The idea that the senate was rejected because a relatively tiny part of it has changed slightly defies the imagination. For what purpose does the gentleman from Gaston Representative Torbett rise. Speak on the amendment Speaker. Gentleman has devoted to debate the amendment Thank you, I rise also in support of the amendment offered by my sick Representative Jordin. I think often, much often too that we for some reason look at the people and the unemployment has been inherently bad, and I'm not one of those kind people. I think people are inherently good and I think that people out there seeking job employment or hiring good and trying to produce the best county job. Not everyone will be happy that bureau system we shouldn't be angry at all of them we should be angry with those that abuse the system, which we have address and other registration we could frag address in future registration but you're  saying that quite often we go when they attempt to punishing all for the sins of appeal and, I support the members and hope others will as well. For what purpose does the gentleman from Mecklenburg Representative Jeter rise? To debate the amendment.  The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment. Let me start off by saying something that I think it's important and I truly believe all 120 of us in this room believe. The vast, vast, vast super-majority of people who find themselves on unemployment are going to do everything they can to find work I don't subscribe to the theory and I don't believe anybody in this room subscribe to the theory. That these people are working looking hard for jobs. I don't believe that. Other bad actors, there's bad actors in everything, in every issue and every circumstance of life. So I don't think this amendment has anything to do with punishing anybody. I think it has to do with trying to encourage. I also think that in some degree we have to trust the process. Representative Howard who sits in seat number one, because she's been around a long time she's still young looks great by the way. But representative Howard sat on a committee that unanimously agreed five was the right number. They were three senators in that committee my good friend Skip Stam just said it would defy logic if the Senate didn't agree, I've met the Senate! They defy logic! So if the argument is, this is not about punishing these people that need work, it's about trying to find a way to help, I strongly believe everybody who, you know what? If my good friend Josh Dobson was out of a job, and he hates me and my seatmate right now, now he's going to look for 20 jobs a day. That's not what this is about. This is about trying to set together parameters to make sure that we are doing whatever we can with the employers

money, and asking for five based on a unanimous recommendation by an oversight committee that this body put together is the right decision and it shouldn't be over ruled by one individdual in this case secretary Fowell who changed his mind. We are talking about five a week, on a unanimous recommendation by the house in the senate, and right know if that doesn't tell you we should vote no I don't know what will For what purpose does the gentleman from Chowan representative Steinbug rise? To speak on the amendment.  The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment.  Ladies and gentlemen of the house I find it interesting that we've gone from thinking that perhaps searching for five jobs is a little bit to much to ask of the folks who are seeking employment and now we're arguing that the employers are burdened because they've to hand out recommendations and talk to folks who are coming in looking for a job, they're both participant in this process. The number five is not unreasonable as has been mentioned many times I'm  not going to be redundant but the argument that an employer resolve the burden by this folks coming and seeking employment to me beyond  the pale. For what purpose does the gentleman from Guilford representative Blust rise? See if representative Howard would yield for a question? Does the lady from Dave yield to the gentleman from Guilford? Yes sir. She yields. Representative Howard, I didn't know this amendment was coming today, but I had actually been thinking about this very issue the other day after we had already voted and this has been discussed. And I do get the thinking sometimes it does take and I understand we want those on unemployment to be actively seeking workers hard as they can do it, but sometimes it does take a while and I'm wondering if you go to four, five, six weeks or even longer is it practical to keep finding what if you've already what if someone have already exhausted all of the leads and the and the employers they can think of does.. Is the test under this bill met if you go back to another employer for like the seconds, third, fourth or fifth time over time to inquire again as to whether they will hire you. We know that would be up to the person's looking for the job. I think that thing change every, week there's new jobs that are created in there with industry every week so they though may not be hiring today in two weeks they may be and there's the great possibility that the person that is in one career path and working in one job may totally change and go to a different profession and find employment there. I can't give you a Yes or No answer, is five the right number? Is three the right number? Are the contacts the right solution? We have to look at it as we go forward, that's worked in other States. In North Carolina's plan is different, we made it different purposefully in order to achieve re-employment for our folks. All of the resources are there for resumes, for how to dress for a job, we've put all the tools in place for clothes to find a job, but I can't give you an answer of the right number of contacts or what's right or wrong. Follow up, Mr. Speaker. Does the lady yield to an additional the question? Yes. She yields. I'm just wondering what technically under the bill would qualify as, would meet the test that, hey! today I made a contact after this week I made five. Suppose I lost, I was not re-elected, I lost my job at home and I come down here, and everyday I go to the speaker's office. I'm on unemployment, I go to

speaker's office, would you hire me on your staff? No.  And on Monday he says no right? So I've got a contact, I've been turned down. Tuesday I show up, and I ask him, would you hire me on your staff? and I go through that for the whole week, the second week I do it again, the third week I do it again, I'm I meeting the test under this bill will I still qualify if I just pick out one employer, and ask them everyday if they'll hire me, is there any requirement that it has to be desperate employers? the word here representative Bress the common sense, even if an employer turns you down, flat no, I'm not hiring, you're not qualified I would hide that out of good common sense, you would look elsewhere, instead of just beating a dead horse to death that would obviously be what you will be doing. But I really want to work for the speaker? For what purpose does the gentleman from Wake representative Penlinton rise? What purpose does the gentleman, does the lady from Davie desire further debate? For what purpose foes the gentleman from Ash representative Jordan rise? To debate the amendment a second time? The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment a second time. Well, we have my expectations once again we've gotten off track what is the right number? The language says at least, so people can do whatever. The current law says is two on separate days, we're moving it to either five or three, we're increasing it either way. The and now make people go to look for jobs we have lowered the number of weeks if you can get it and we have lowered the maximum amount that is where we will get people getting jobs right after we did make the policy change or we talk about here with three, is an administrated policy decision to match 44 other states so what is the right number. In order to be consistent across the nation, 44 and pick three, that seems to be the number that was the works people can choose more and more to get a job all I'm saying here is not a burden is not too many and none is purely is an administrated number and is one of the biggest distant or we can run an issue on an administrated issues in December if we don't to make it three and much four in the state special in the border counties. And that is all this about, thank you Mr. Speaker please on the amendment. Further discussion, further debate. If not, the question for the House is the adoption of amendment one set forward by Representative John. Those in favor will vote aye, those opposed will vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 49 having voted in the affirmative, and 60 in the negative, the amendment fails. Further discussion further debate on the bill. For what purpose does the gentleman from Durham, Representative Hall, rise? To speak on the bill. The gentleman has the floor to debate the bill. Thank you Mr. Speaker. I heard the discussion. I appreciate it, since we got off on a track about people's entitlement to unemployment benefits and a lot of comments were made about whether people merit them, or whose money it is, and those types of things, and I'd hope that we'd remember that in order to qualify for those benefits, you must have work at least three of the previous four quarters, and the benefits are based on that work history. So a lot of times we somehow create this fictional character that someone's just walking in off the street, who hasn't contributed and didn't have these funds taken out of their employment from their previous time. And so I would hope we would respect all North Carolinians who do in fact put in the time and want to find jobs, and who do work, and if they are getting unemployment benefits, we keep in mind that that meant they did work during a period of time to support our State and their community and their family, and they may have fallen upon hard times. So I hope we'll always consider that when we create this mythical figure that gets unemployment benefits without having worked and produced and provided some help to their community. Thank you, Mr Speaker. For what purpose does the gentleman from Iredell, Representative Fraley rise? To ask Representative Bradford a question. Does the gentleman from Mecklenburg yield to the gentleman from Iredell? Yes Sir.

Representative Bradford I wondered if you happen to have any openings in the various areas legislative districts that you might approach your fellow legislators with job opportunities for supplemental legislative income, thank you. Because I feel your pain I most certainly would entertained because we're hiring.  Further discussion for the debate, if not the question for the house is the passage of senate bill 15 on its third reading, those in favor will vote aye those opposed will vote no the clerk will open the vote the clerk will lock machine, will record the vote. 82 having voted in the affirmative and 28 in the negative senator bill 15 passes its third reading and will be returned to the senate. Members a couple of introduction there would like to make first of, our Doctor today is with us today. Dr. Walter Lee Ferny from Shelby. Dr. Ferny I'm glad to have you here sir and also a motion of represented Bradford of [xx] county the chair is happy to extend the courtesy is the gallery to Tracy Lewis [xx] who served in the National Board Of Directors for the National Association Residential Property Managers. She lives in Virginia but she has the honor of visiting the state and nation here today gland to have you here would you please stand so that we can welcome you, thank you. Special message from the Senate, the Clerk will read. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to your message received today the house rest opportunity to concur with hospital bill 327 senate community substitute 2, 6 edition a bill to be entire on act to transform and reorganize North Carolina medicate in North Carolina heath choice program revive plan over site and administration of state ward health exchange network to increase Medicaid rates to primary care physicians and to discontinue medicaid primary care case management. The president pro tempore reports, senators highest paid [xx] chair, senator Rucho, Collick[sp?], Baranger[sp?] and McKissick to be part of the senate to control the [xx] media point back and that the differences arising may be resolved, respect for the [xx]. Noted. Representatives Brawley, Sain, Haistings, Martin, Cetran[sp?] [xx] recognized in 10 fourth committee report, the clerk will read. Representatives Brawley, Saine, Hastings, Martin, Setzer and Szoka senate bill, finance committee report, senate bill 156 not getting a child division consolidation favorable. Calendar. Senate bill 399 joint agency tax refund favorable. Calendar. Senate bill 541, Regulate transportation network companies favorable. Calendar. For what purpose does the gentleman from McDowell, Representative Dobson rise? Thank you Mr. Speaker. To be recorded as having voting aye on Senate bill 15. The gentleman will be recorded as having voted I on Senate bill 15. Senate Bill 665, the Clerk will read. Senator Apodaca, Senate Bill 665, a bill to be entitled an act to enact the North Carolina Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits Act. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: For what purpose does the gentleman from Stanly, Representative Burr rise? Speak on the bill, Mr. Speaker. The gentleman has the floor to debate the bill. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, this bill is an effort to expand in North Carolina, our effort and the effort of insurance companies to find deceased, the policyholder's beneficiaries in a timely manner. The bill passed out of the Judiciary A Committee yesterday with unanimous support, supported bipartisanly in the Senate, is supported by the Treasurer and by the Commissioner of Insurance, and is sort of bringing us in line with where a lot of other States are headed, over 20 states that have passed criminals laws, Mr. Speaker I do have an amendment this time I would like to send forward please. I could send forward an amendment The gentleman is recognized send forth an amendment [xx]. Representative [xx] to amend the bill on page three, lines four through to 35 by rewriting those lines three. The gentleman has the floor to debate the amendment. Thank Mr Speaker, nearly all of this amendment is technical simply restructuring the language in the bill with the exception if you got to page, the second page of the amendment, you will see that it's adding in one new requirement, and that's they maintain a documentation of all efforts to locate the beneficiary or person where it

would apply, so I would ask for your support of the amendment. Further discussion for the debate on amendment, if not the question for the house is the adoption of amendment one, set fourth by Representative Burke, those in favor will vote aye, those oppose will vote no. The court will open the vote Representative Floyd, [xx] record. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 110 having voted on affirmative, and none the negative, the amendment's adopted, we're now back on the bill. Further discussion, further debate, if not the question for the house is the passage of senate bill 665 on its second reading? Those in favor will vote aye, those who oppose will vote no, the clerk will open the vote. Representative Bradford does the gentleman wish to record? The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 110 having voted the affirmative, and none on the negative, senate bill 665 passes its second reading and will without objection be read a third time. [xx] of North Carolina enacts. Further discussion, further debate if not the question before the house is the passage, senate bill 665 on its third reading, those in favor will say, aye. Those opposed no, the ayes have it. Senate Bill 665 passes its third reading and will be returned to the senate. Yes Madam Clerk, the amendments are ordered engrossed. Senate Bill 675 the clerk will read. Senator Apodaca, Senate Bill 675 [xx] to deal with sexual violence offences North Caroline Annex. What purpose does the gentleman from Henderson representative rise? To speak on the bill. The gentleman has the floor to debate the bill. This bill would limit the frequency of parole reviews for inmates convicted of sexually violent offenses currently inmates would once they qualify for parole would be entitled to a parole view each year and this simply moves that to two years. It was a recommendation put forward by commission was vetted and the judiciary committe had unanimous support there and in the senate. I have no opposition and ask for your suppor for the bill. Further discussion, further debate? If not the question for the house is the passage of senate bill 675 on its second reading. Those in favor will vote I those opposed will vote no. The clerk will open the vote. The clerk will lock the machine and record the vote. 108 having voted in the affirmative and 1 in the negative. Senate bill 675 passes its second reading and will without objection be read the third time. General Assembly of North Carolina enacts. Further discussion further debate. If not, the question for the House is the passage of Senate bill 675 on its third reading. Those in favor will say aye. Aye. Those opposed, say no. The ayes have it. Senate bill 675 is ordered and rolled and sent to the Governor. Notices and announcements. For what purpose does the gentleman from Richmond, Representative Goodman, rise? Point of personal privilege. The gentleman is recognized to speak to a point of personal privilege. Thank you Mr Speaker. Ladies and gentlemen of the House I'd like to congratulate the 12 year old softball team from Richmond county who won the Dixie Youth 12 year old series in [xx] South Carolina couple of weeks ago. It include teams from West Virginia, Florida and as far away as Texas, they were in Senate yesterday for recognition we adjourn before they can get over here, and I just wanted to make that recognition McCanny is very proud of them, thank you very much. For what purpose does the the gentleman from Rowan Representative Ford rise. For a point of personal privilege. The gentleman is recognized to speak to a point of personal privilege. Representative [xx] and I would like to congratulate the Rowan Little league soft ball team representing the South East region last night, defeated Rodd Island 4-2 to win World Championship, the outscored opponents 43-6 during this tournament, and there'll be a parade Saturday at 10:00 AM in the County seed of Rowan county. Congratulations to the Rowan little league soft ball team world champions. Further notices and announcements? if not, the gentleman from Harnett, Representative Lewis is recognized for motion momentarily And members

for members information members who are here there is session on Monday at four, it is a no vote session on Monday. So the business we have, by way of information, the senate I don't think is having any votes I don't think they had votes today we have three bills that came out of finance I believe those are the only bills presently Calendared right now I don't what else maybe Calendared for Tuesday but you don't have to worry Monday no votes Monday. The gentleman is recognized for a motion. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Mr. speaker subject to messages from the senate, committee reports, conference support we refer bills in resolutions and appointments of conferees I move the House now adjourn to reconvene Monday, August 24th at 4 O'Clock PM. Representative Lewis moves, seconded by Representative Dickson that the House do now adjourn subject to receipt of messages from the Senate, committee reports, conference reports, re-referral bills and resolutions, and appointment of conferees to reconvene Monday, August 24th at 4 PM. Those in favor will say Aye. Aye. Those opposed No, the Ayes have it. We stand adjourned.