So we'll come to order. Sergeant at arms close the door, members will go to their seats. Members and guests in the gallery please silence all your electronic devices. Leading the Senate in prayer is Reverent Rodney Coleman of first Baptist church in Chapel hill, he's a guest of Senator [xx], all members and guests in the gallery will you please stand May we pray grace is in glorious God in heaven, thou who knows all things, sees all things and who has created all things, thou is both creator of heaven and earth, we come down God acknowledging you for who you are and how you are. We have convened at this point time and at this [xx] just to say thank you. God there is any discussions on people, politics, policies protocol or procedures God we pause to focus on the one who gives us the power to focus. We thank you God for a new day, a day that we've never seen before nor will we ever see again. God before the worlds were framed you were God and now that the worlds are framed our God and if the world loses its framing you will be God. We ask you, oh God, to search our hearts, and if there's anything in us displeasing to you, we ask God that you may forgive us and restore us all. Create in us clean hearts God and renew us the right spirits. We pray, and we lift up all these women and men. Our elected officials. We're asking God that you grant them on wisdom. We pray, God, for clarity of their minds, strength for their bodies, spirits of camaraderie and unity, and we pray God that this faculties be used to help and bless our citizens, your people. We ask that those, God, who have convened today who're dealing with personal in personal, private and public battles be restored, we ask God that your presence be felt and that your spirit not only [xx] [xx] over us but God dwell within us, not only in this building, and in this room but in our hearts so that we can make you proud and they can make you proud as they review, and deliberate and legislate laws that ensure promise and hope for those who depend on them to do so. Finally God, may the Spirit of the only wise God, regulate our hearts, guard our thoughts so that we will remain servants of you God, and be considered servants of all, and we pray this prayer in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen. Senator is recognized for a motion. Thank you Mr. President, the journal of Wednesday June 10th 2015 has been examined is found incorrect, I move that we reading of the Journal when its stand to prove this road. Senators lets come to order.come to order. That object that general perjune understands a prove is written. We have reasons absences granted today for senators Melldeth[sp?], Weiben[sp?] and Tillman. We have some other news today with us today is Karl[sp?] Mutual[sp?] from North Carolina is here, Norse Newton[sp] thanks for joining us in the senate today. On the motion senator Cregogry county the chair is happy to extended the courtesy of the gallery to Mackies Young and Alexander Cupper, Markies[sp?] is a nationally recognized blogger is with us today Markese[sp] appear for the audience stand for the audience, thanks for joining us. Do we have any reports of standing committees today? any report of standing committees now we move right into the calendar for the day Sen. Apodaca for what purpose do you rise? You are standing up. We will move right into the calendar for the day starting with local bill third reading local senate bill 50 clerk will read senate bill 50 Wilson county I proceed tax modification. Do we have any discussion or debate
hearing none the question before the senate is the passage of committee substitute senate bill 50 on it's third reading all in favor vote Aye oppose vote no five seconds to be allowed for voting and the clerk will record the vote [xx] Bryan, Jackson I, Ford I, Braynt I Wadel I clerk I. 41 having voted in the affirmative and five in the negative Mr. President Senator Ford for what purpose do you rise? That is a No. Senator Ford is a No on that vote, 40 thank you senator, 40 having voted in the affirmative and six in the negative committee substitute senate bill 50 passes it's third reading. Mr. President. Yes Sen. Krawiec. I would like to change my vote to I. Sen krawiec changes her vote to aye. Final count is that the final count? Is that correct? 41 to 5 that passes its third reading and it will be sent to the house. So if we have five other local bills third reading roll call which I would like to block vote unless somebody wants to pull any of those out so without objections we'll block vote the next five, hearing no objection house bill 73 house bill 99 house bill 217 house bill 218 And house bill 353 go for proper read. House bill 783 caring an extension house bill 99 turn an appropriate de-annexsaion. House 217 claim de-annexartion, annexation, house bill 218 Claiken annexation house bill 353 Wilson mil settlement annexation. Question before the senate is the passage of house bill 73, house bill 99, house bill 217, house bill 218 and house bill 353 on it's third reading all on favor of it aye oppose vote no five seconds bill out for the voting and clerk will record the vote, Brian aye Jackson Davis aye Jackson aye, 47 having voted informative and zero in the negative house bill 73 passes its third reading it will be enrolled House Bill 99 passes it's third reading it will be enrolled. House Bill 217 passes it's third reading it will be sent to the house for concurrence in the senate committee substitute. House Bill 218 passes its third reading will be enrolled ans House Bill 353 passes its third reading and it will be enrolled. Moving onto local bill second reading House Bill 263 local reading. House bill 263 city election Trinity and Greensboro. Senator Wayne is recognized to speak to the bill. Thank you, Mr. President. This is a local bill, the first part of it is for the city at Trinity it reduces the size of the city council from eight members to five members, and reduces the term for the mayor and the city council members from four years to two years The second part for the city at Greensboro has already passed the senate, but there's been three changes which I think read the bill. The first one is that the redistricting can be altered after the Federal Census in 2020 by the city council it also there was a technical correction, the mayor will be allowed to vote until the new council was sited and then after that the mayor will vote only in a town and the following day has been changed to give a little extra time to term to July 27th at noon, and it closes on noon August 7th, 2015 prayers[sp?] for your support and any questions I'll be glad to answer. We're having a discussion or debate? Senator Robinson for [xx] to send forth an amendment. Senator Robinson you can send forth your amendment. [xx] senator Robinson moves to amend the bill. Senator Robinson is recognized to speak to the amendment. Mr. President thank you this is the motion divert the bill pursuing to rule
any here even to the parliament separate pals stay separate, and this thing of private session capable of standing along proposition[sp] one sections one and three, propositions two sections two and three and this would give this body and opportunity to the issue that was issued was already I sake with bill and the undergoings very issue is well . Miswell[sp] senator Ravason, the debate appearance over the amendment given that forward is really that this part of really in motion to divide the question which is not really in the amendment so that the question would be the motion to divide process the amendment, Sik Abudak process is yours. Speak up the motion Sik Abudak you have the way forward Thank you Mr. Representative members and I now think the motion necessarily unless give the motion gains the place, Here we have the right language up, Thank you. So, the question for the Senate is the motion to divide the question. All in favor vote I, oppose vote No, five seconds to be allowed for the voting, the voting Clerk will record the vote. aye Smith Ingram, aye. [xx] no 15. Mr. President. Yes senator. I need to vote aye on the motion. okay so what the chain senator wanted from no to I Anybody else want to change the vote alright 16 having voted in the affirmative, and 31 in the negative of the motion to divide the question fails the bill was back before us do we have any further discussion or debate? Senator Robertson what purpose do you ask just speak on the bill senator Robertson has proposed to speak on the bill. Thank you Mr. President senate bill 263 while around each says [xx] Greens was simply an attempt by senator Wales to ignore the will of the people of the city of Greens far cheer just stand one tiny move paper the lines of times that the [xx] who supported the bill to register however you have received hundreds of emails and there were over 5000 signatures in the list of addition to the green [xx] Acre oppose on the registration every question that have read lead them to vote on senate bill 36 and is currently being senator in the house there has been several forms held by our delegation in Greens by our team all republican in our delegation attended the exempt senator way of course senator Bragger who represents two different just areas they ask people to listen and so if all parties represent the people we gather been while is registration moving forward in the senate when republicans and democrats in house they have said they oppose this, if I indicated before Senate bill 36 and now Senate Bill 263 breaks up African-American neighborhoods that have traditionally voted in the same critics this is voter disenfranchisement. While we did this in 2010 past African American into districts against out will. This legislation is an attempt to once again threaten those strengths of African American voters with regressive redistricting. Haven't you as Republicans done enough to my people because I can see you don't consider them your people. Senator Wade's excuse for proposing Senate Bill 36 was that power in Greensboro was packed into downtown. Well this bill not only impacts several elected officials who were elected none-partisan in the downtown area, but it also impacts two African Americans, the first African
American woman ever elected mayor in the city Greensboro by both parties, and another African American city councilman. Rather than increasing opportunity for a people who has been denied rights in this country for centuries, you decrease the opportunity for representation by undermining the strength of African American voters and all voters in Greensboro. I'm asking you to vote this legislation down I know that you represent your party, but this ought to be about people and the request of the people. The majority of the people in Greensboro have said no. They want a referendum. Give them the opportunity to exercise their rights as we give to anyone. I hope you will oppose this bill. Do we have any further discussion or debate? Senator Wade, for what purpose do you rise? To speak on the bill. Senator Wade has the floor to speak to the bill this Senate has completely discussed this bill before. You supported it then. I ask for your support now there was a poll done by a reputable paper in Greensboro, and it found that most people wanted the change also the size of the paper really doesn't matter. They are paying for a poll lot to do it and use of correct sample. I would say that since then we've had the mayor actually the principle come out and say we've really lost focus for the city council. I think this party it needs to do everything they can, to help Green Spa regain their focus, and move forward, and be prosperous in this State and I think this bill will help do that. I'll appreciate your support. We have it Senator Robinson for your purpose arise? Just speak a second time. Senator Robinson has been forced to speak the second time. Thank you Mr. President I want the record corrected to say the poll was not representative and that they're others in Greens berg who and Representative Paul and also listens about I spoke at several forums huge forums of hundreds of people across the city So it is incorrect which is stated and the will of the people is let us board, all they are asking for is the right for referendum so that they can say what they had if they want this form of government they'll say so if they don't they'll support your bill. I hope you will vote this down. Any further discussion or debate? Hearing the question before the senate and is the passage of committee substitute the house bill 263 on it's second reading. All in favor will vote aye, oppose will vote no five seconds be allowed for the voting clerk will record the vote, 31 having voted in the affirmative and 16 in the negative senate committee substitute house bill 263 passes it's second reading without objection be read for a third time. North Carolina general assembly act. Any other discussion or debate? Hearing none the question before the senate is the passage of senate committee substitute house bill 263 on it's third reading all in favor will vote aye, oppose will vote no five seconds be allowed for the voting clerk will record the vote Hundson, Hundoson 30 having voted in the affirmative and 16 in the negative senate committee substitute senator Hundson, aye 31 have voted for the affirmative and 16 in the negative the house bill 263 passes this, third reading it will be sent to the house for [xx] senate community substitute moving on to public bill second reading, house bill 44 clerk will read House bill 44 local government [xx] 2015 Senator [xx] is recognized to speak to the bill. Thank you Mr. President, this bill was [xx] yesterday, it was affirmative vote and no one was against it we had a pretty lively conversation on these yesterday and I believe Senator Tucker has an amendment and there are few amendments today Mr. President so I'd like it this time to go ahead and do the amendments if that's okay and I think Senator Tucker might have wanted to start with his amendment. Senator Tucker do you have an amendment you'd like to send forward? Mr. President at this time I'd like to remove my amendment we have some conflict in language that I've discovered
here just now, so I'd like to remove that. Do we have any further discussion or debate on the bill. Senator ford to speak on the amendment Senator Ford send forward your amendment [xx] Senator Wade move to the bill Senator Wade is recognized to speak to the amendment All this does is on face of wrapping and what it does is it just makes a certain a date a 36 months. That's the only correction, either a certificate of occupancy or 36 months and I'd appreciate your support. we have a discussion all the day on the amendment, hearing none, what is before the senate is adopting the amendment one I oppose vote no, five seconds to be allowed for the voting clerk will record the vote. Newton Aye. Tucker Aye beginners high, low high, 47 having voted in the affirmative and zero in the negative, amendment one is adopted the bill as amended as back before the body! Do we have any further discussion or debate? Hearing none the question before the senate is to passage of the senate committee substitute to health bill Senator Stein for what purpose do you rise? To debate the bill. Senator Stein has the floor to debate the bill. Thank you. Work a little slow on her, finger point over here on the button, appreciate the attention of the senate I wanted to talk specifically about section 13 and 14 the riparian buffer sections they address two specific river basins, the Neuse river basin which hits Newbern and Tao Pamical river basin which comes out little Washington for those of you who other parts of the state and they both run into the Permical Sylum, these are precisely rivers in which there were massive fish kills in the 90s early 2000s which helps us to focus attention on water quality and the sounds, buffers are the cheapest and the most defuse way of keeping drinking water clean its spreads the pain a little bit along anybody who touches the river keeps 50 foot of vegetation on the side of the river and that acts as a screen to get out pollutants and harmful pollution into the river understand that this river basins provide drinking water for people in East and North Carolina all the way to the coast and their are federal requirements as to how how clean that in water must be and if the water quality degrades which it will if we get rid of the buffers then other sources of pollution whether it's agriculture whether it's point sources industry whether it's municipalities though their water systems waste systems they are going to have to spend more money to reduce their share of pollution into the riverbed so what we're doing is transferring costs from the cheapest and most diffuse way of keeping our water clean to other industries, point sources, to farmers and to tax payers. The [xx] sound is the second largest wearing an attire in the United Sates, it's one of the best source of fisheries in the nation. We need to be exceedingly careful with that water and eliminating the buffers for essentially 90% of the land that aborts the tall palm[sp?] and the news is a major step backward for clean water, clean drinking water in North Carolina. I have talked to the bill sponsor just this morning because this bill, I just read it last night. It came through a committee and this was a new provision for me and I've shared an amendment on this provision because there's another section, section 15 which directs the environmental amendment[sp?] to look at precisely this very question, to look at the issue of Riparian Buffers and so I think the prudent course for us is let's have the EMC Look at the riparian buffers particularly it relates to the news on the program before we take this fairly aggressive a almost radical steps of eliminating buffers and most of it is in North Carolina riparian buffers, so though sponsor has agreed to look at this issue of the weekend I'm going be objecting before agreeing I won't offer now I hope that we come some accord on this issue because I don't
think any of us have an interest and having both our drinking water more polluted and damaging the particle sound and estuary that is there. Thank you. Senator Ford for what purpose do you rise? See if bill sponsor will entertain a question. Senator Wade do you yield for a question? Yes sir I do. Thank you senator if you'll be patient with me and look at section four which deals with the the fetch wrapping subsection I there is an exemption from the zoning regulations pertaining to signage under this article is it possible Senator, that a property owner could accept signage let's say for a gentlemans' club or an alcoholic beverage right across the street from let's say a residential area, a church or even a school? Senator Ford, I appreciate you bringing that up and we have talked with Senator Jackson about that, and I'd thought there would be amendment coming forth. Do you have that Sir? [xx] Senator Jackson, for what purpose do you rise? As it happens, to offer an amendment. Senator Jackson, you can send forward your amendment. The Clerk will read. Senator Jackson moves to amend the bill. Senator Jackson is recognized to speak to the amendment. The amendment would specify that you cannot use that signage to advertise if you're not directly involved in the construction, that's all. Senator Wade, for what purpose do you rise? And I think that's a good amendment, and I appreciate you bringing it forth. Do we have any further discussion or debate on amendment two, hearing none the question before the senate is the adoption of amendment two all in favor vote aye opposed vote no five seconds be allowed for the voting and the clerk will record the vote. Newton aye, [xx] aye, Davis aye, Gunn changes his vote to aye 47 having voted in the affirmative zero in the negative amendment two is adopted the bill as amended is back before the body. Do we have any further discussions or debate? Senator Ford what purpose do you rise? Thank you Mr. President, I got one more question for the bill's sponsor, she will entertain it. Senator Wade do you yield? Yes sir Senator Wade, I want you to take another look with me here briefly at section 12 notice prior to construction, and I think it's a nice courtesy to have two residents and to folks who live next to public construction. My concern is based on the way that language is written if a, let's say the city or the county wanted to provide other connection for someone who's on on well water and they have to move back close and equipments to dig the trenches will that customer under this bill have to wait 30 days to get their water tapped into public water, even tho it wouldn't take 30 days to do the installation. Mr. President. You have the floor Senator. Senator Ford this was put in for repairs such as someone decides to put a bus stop in in front of your business and you're gone, you come back the next day was there, and you didn't have any notification it was happening, and you not even on the bus line. It was for that notification and we could certainly check on the issue you raised because I know senators Stan is going to object to third readings if you are Okay with that we'll check and make sure. Thank you madam. Senator Jackson, for what purpose do you arise? To speak on the bill. Senator Jackson the floor to speak on the bill Respectfully, I would like to add to the list of things that we're going to check on between second and third reading and Madam bill sponsor, this will pertain to section five, it says if a permit submit the prominent application or any type of development, and rule of ordinance changes in the time of prominent application submitted and permanent decision is made and proper time can choose which version. The scenario which I'm thinking about is when it is announced that the ordinance will be changed in six months forward, and that produces a flood of permanent application. The question is what constitute a permanent application? My concern is that, if we don't specify what is sufficient to constitute a permanent application, we're inviting some needless allegation down the road, when the question is, were certain projects grandfathered if they were submitted but on up game or submitted missing certain documents? humans that are typically included, so
I did have a n amendment here, I don't think it's sufficient as far as definign that term and there is something I want to work on With you and your staff to do, and again the goal will just be to avoid some needless litigation down the road when people are arguing about whether in fact what they submitted was a permanent application because my understanding is those differ from county to county. Do we've any further discussion or debate? Senator Walter for what purpose do you rise? To peak to the bill. Senator Walter has floor to speak to bill My concern about Section 7 of the bill and particularly the provision that asks that any removal of lanes within a municipality be reviewed by the full board of transportation. And often times these raw diets when we remove lanes are very important to municipality, to traffic count, traffic flow, pedestrian safety, bicycle safety. Particularly when you look at those parts of state roads, about churches, schools, hospitals, when they run through residential neighborhoods, they run through business districts, events spaces like ball parks and theaters where they are heavy used by pedestrians, by bicyclists. So these are often imported and not just in large municipalities but in small towns as well. I believe the provision here in Section 7 is duplicative unnecessary relatively prove to be closely to local governments. It will flow down projects forcing a review of all of these removals of lanes, these road giudes will require significant lead time. I talked with my two division engineers today and their projects could see as much as 90 day delay just for an initial review by the full Board of Transportation. It's going to require significant extra work on the part of the local governments, as well as, our division offices. Currently any request from a municipality to reduce the sides of a state road in its jurisdiction those though an incredibly tharal process first to request of the local government it is reviewed thoroughly by the division engineering staff and then the division engineering staff rules. These are not rubber stamps. Many of these are turned down. I reviewed with my two division engineers that they had a number of projects that they've turned down in recent years. So that work is already in place. You have that thorough review. Why did the Department of Transportation fire it's professional engineering staff? this will add yet another layer of review request all the way to the board of transportation. Thirdly it places the entire board of transportation in an unnecessary position. Will the division board member from division 14 understand the need division nine and be able to make a decision, a wise decision about a raw diet in division nine. Will the board member from division two to be able to fully assess a request from division five? I think not. You already have your engineering staff review this and make it's recommendation positively or negatively on the project. One of the things I think we've all agreed on and we've seen this change over the last decade in both Democratic and Republican administrations under the leadership of the Republic majority here in the General Assembly that we wanted the Board of Transportation to move away from this one off political decisions, and begin to set more policy and that's been a positive move. This I believe backs us up a step, and gets us into political one off kind of decisions that I think many of us thought were problem for sometime. The decision on these roads, ladies and gentleman, should be local, let the local decisions be local. Senator Wade for what purpose do you rise? To see if the speaker will yield to question. Senator Waddell do you yield for the question? Yes sir I do. Senator Waddell do you realize this is only talking about pipelines, when they're. I do, yes I do, absolutely do. Senator Waddell you have the floor. Yes sir thank you Mr. President, to continue, let these local issues be local. Lots of local officials work with their division engineering staff, and their division board member not bring this to the 14 member Board of Transportation. It's unnecessary it's duplicative and costly with that Mr. President I'd like to offer the amendment. You can sent forward your amendment senator. Clerk read.
Senator Wade moves to amend the bill. Senator Wade is recognized to speak to the amendment. [xx] be the case for why I believe this provision in section seven is unnecessary, duplicative, and will prove costly to the local governments. This would remove that section of the bill and make these local decisions local, and I urge your support. Senator Wade for what purpose of your rise? I would ask that you vote against the amendment these are roads that have been put in by the state money by tax payers and I think they should be reviewed by the board of transportation before we make those changes. do you have any further discussion or debate. Senator Lee for what purpose of your rise? Having been on the board of transportation senator Lee for what purpose of your rise? To speak on the amendment. Senator Lee you have the floor to speak on the amendment. Having been on the board of transportation I would also as that you not support the amendment. Do we have any further discussion or debate on amendment three. Senator Davis for what purpose of your rise? To speak on the amendment. You have the floor senator. Actually I would like to ask senator Wade if she would yell for a question. Senator Wade do you yell? I will. Thank you Senator Wade. Senator Wade, on this particular provision does the NCDOT have a stand on this that you know of? Not that I know of Mr president I'd like to address the same question to the amendment sponsor. Senator wade do you yield for a question yes sir I will. Do you know if NCDOT has a stand on this particular provision? Senator Davis I spoke with my two division engineers I don't believe they speak for the department so I can't speak for the administration I know my two division engineers expressed their opposition to this for the reason that I stated thank you Mr president. Senator Stein for what purpose do you rise? To see if the bill sponsor will yield to a question. Senator Wade do you yield? Sure I will Does the bill also require the Board of Transportation to approve any municipalities elimination of a by-claim and adding more car lanes? Senator Stan, there's the reduction of travel lanes to accomodate the addition of bike lanes within the existing paved and marked lanes of the State, any State highway system. So they haven't been made by plane yet Mr president follow up question do you yield for a follow up Senator Wade? Yes I do For there are plenty of bike lanes that exist in cities, and my question is if a city wants to eliminate a bike and add more car lanes does the board of transportation have to prove that?, and if not why are we burdening the Board of Transportation with these small decisions for bike lane addition, but not bike lane eliminations? I think this, mister president, this problem came fourth because there was already with beveling and they wanted to reduce the number of lanes to possibly two lanes or three lanes to put in a bike lane, the bike lane did not already exist. Do we have any further discussion or debate on the amendment. Senator Block for what purpose do you rise? Think I can ask for Senator Stance question. Senator Locky speaking on the amendment If you are looking at taking a by plain and to a car lane unless that by claim was made for senator Apodaca and senator [xx] when they ride bicycle you are going to allow more space in what is available in a regular black line so you will have to go through a regular road project and I want to see their model ten bicycle so Senator Smith Ingram for what purpose do you rise? To debate the amendment Senator Smith Ingram has the floor to speak on the amendment Well I understand that this roads were paved with taxpayer dollars I do understand what it means on being staid in this small town I urge you to support this amendment because we are promoting businesses this is we are promoting more activity in our small town and this will give the local government the ability to be able to track and recruit and provide economic development opportunities Senator Wade for what purpose do you rise? Ask to do not support the amendment and he did know that after the border transportation looks that they could have a positive response to what you asking Do we have any further discussion or debate on the amendment, Senator Woodward for what purpose do you rise? Mr. President may I ask the bill
sponsor question Senator Wade do you yield I do So the way it is, the concern here is reviewed by border transportation senator release spoke to that point. Would you agree to an amendment that would say instead of review by the entire board transportation, review an approval by the vision the single board member in which the project decors Senator Woodward, I would like the legislation the way it it here in bill and I would ask that you support that and not support them in [xx] may speak second time now Senator Walter you introduced the Bill, you can speak to the amendment, go right ahead. You introduced the amendment, you can speak it, go right ahead. Thank you Mr. President. Again, ladies and gentlemen, these are all tax dollars and the people in that municipality also paid those tax dollars. I will just reiterate the point that I've made, that why do we have a state board of transportation ruling on projects only all over the state. Again, we're taking that local authority, local control, local review it's already in place, our State Department of Transportation reviews by its engineering staff. Let's our Board of Transportation be the policy makers that we want them to be and not sit here and rule on these by planes every time there's a request. I urge you to support the amendment. do we have any further discussion or debate on amendment three?. Hearing none, request for senator's adoption of amendment three, all in favor of it, I, oppose the vote, no. Five seconds to be allowed for the voting Corporal record the vote. 17 having voted in the affirmative and 30 in the negative. Amendment three fails. The Bill has amended is back before the body do we have any further discussion or debate? Senator Bryan[sp?] for what purpose do you rise? To ask the Bill's sponsor a question. Senator Wade do you yield for a question? glad to have you back Senator Brian. Miss you, yes sir, I will. Thank you. I was concerned about the repairing buffers and my understanding is is that on dinner has been a struggle from legislation in 2013 to study on water quality rules this year not sure when they will be completed, but I was wondering if there was a reason we were preempting their study and recommendations with this particular prohibition around the repair and buffers and just Senator Brian would you agree to meet with us with Senator Stan and we can ask to these questions and see if we can get together. Okay, thank you I'd like to speak to speak on the bill. Senator Brian you've the floor to speak to the bill. Members I'm concerned I've a similar concern that I've with the super bill in that we are going to plan an exception and eliminating the repair and buffers in I'm not clear and I'm not sure if anyone else is clear to what extend any protection is left and that's my concern for the top I'm based on and the fisheries there, and the water qualities there. And we're from in a region where a lot of challenges with water quality and the importance of the fisheries is paramount as is the case with many of our colleagues I just want to caution us. I'm not sure why we were rush to this while we could address it in small session, and short session after we have discussed it for example, and know more clearly what impact changes we will have I just want to make that comment to the members thank you Any further discussion or debate on the bill we're in arm for the senate have passed it to senate sub committee has article 44 as amended on second reading on favour of an I possible no five seconds left for voting [xx] 32 having voted in the affirmative 15 in the negative senate committee substitute House Bill 44 as amended passed as the second reading without objection be read the third time. Mr. President. Senator Stanford propose your ayes. To object the third reading. Senator an objection the third reading will remain on the calendar. House Bill 86. Mr. President. Senator Byron propose yours. I had to change my vote on amendment three from aye to no. Byron changes her vote from aye to no on amendment three final count 16-31 House Bill 86, the clerk will read. House Bill 86 utility line relocation school mode. Senator Gunn is recognized to speak to the bill. Thank you Mr. President, the DOT currently must pay for
a non betterment calls to move water and sewer lines belonging to a number of entities what this bill will do will add water and sewer line owned by Local Boards of Education to the type of aligns to the Department of Transportation most paid will relocate for transportation improvement projects he is fine with this, I appreciate his support. Any discussion or debate on House Bill 86? Hearing none question for the senators is the passage of House Bill 86 on a second reading all in favor vote aye oppose will no five seconds be allowed for the voting, the clerk will record the vote. Clerk aye, Stain, ye Smith. Got you Birmingham aye, 47 having voted in the affirmative and zero in the negative House Bill 86 passes its second reading without objection being read the third time. North Carolina general assembly act. Any discussion on debate? Hearing none cross oppose senate the passage of House Bill 86 on its third reading all in favor say aye, Aye. Oppose no, The ayes have it will be enrolled and sent to the governor. House Bill 339 clerk will read. House Bill 339 had fonts of foreign trail to state park system. Senator Daniel is recognized to speak to the bill. Thank you Mr. President, members of the senate, I guess it's a good timing that bill came to the floor just week because on June nineth just two days ago the lake Whitney [xx] will surround Lake James a beautiful lake in Brook County was named in USA today as one of the top 25 best places to fish and bow in the United State. This bill which has brought consensus sense this both state agencies and stake holders merely adds the trial that will be build around the lake to the state trail system, and parts of the trail that are within the park boundaries will be maintained by the park and parts that are outside at the boundary of the park will be maintained by various stakeholders and sort of conservation groups I'm also glad to announce the strong support for this trail by two members that we've discussed today Senator Apodaca and Senator Lowe and now that they are hoping that someday once the trail is completed that they can bike together on this trail and we have ensure that all the bridges across the various strings that the trail across would be built to standard so they will be able to be accommodative. So I ask for your support for the bill and look forward to maybe biking with them even thank you. Any discussion or debate Senator Lowe for what purpose do you rise? To debate the bill. Senator Walls you have the floor. I am concerned that a because me and senator Apodaca do plan to use this trail that it will be up to standard and that's all I have to say on this. Senator Waddell for what purpose of your rise? See if the bill sponsor would yield to a question. Senator Daniel do you yield to a question? Senator Daniel do you yield for a question? I yield. Senator since we've got confirmation Senator Walls and Apodaca will use the trail, would you consider a friendly amendment banning men of a certain shape from wearing wearing those tight stretchy pants. Senator Wood that's a great question and I think if you would like to object the third reading I would be glad But over the weekend look at the amendment. Hearing no further discussion or debate question for the senate is the passage of house bill 339 on it's second reading all in favor vote aye Aye oppose vote no five seconds to be allowed for the voting, clerk will record the vote, 47 having voted in the affirmative zero in the negative house bill 339 passes it's second reading without objection be read a third time. North Carolina general assembly enacts. Do we have any discussion or debate hearing none the question before the senate is passage of house bill 339 on it's third reading all in favor say aye oppose no the aye's have it house bill 339 passes it's third reading reading it will be enrolled and sent to the governor, House bill 812 clerk will read. House bill 812 grand recipients personal grants website? Senator Brock recognize speak to the bill. Thank you mister president. Under a senate, governor produce administration she created the open board which was open [xx] state government for citizens to see where the money stands been and where the money was going, their bill sponsor Albert [xx] actually looking for some information online, as trying to look at all the different agencies in the the state and many of the agencies want a hearing toward governor produce open book so he introduces legislation to make sure that people know what in North Carolina was and okay want get the great money and recipients and senses that we got of
a few come on forward this despite the encouragement for this agencies to show how they are spending their money in the state and I think [xx] was a good idea, the [xx] is a good idea then it is a great idea now and I urge your support of the registration. Further discussion or debate? Hearing none both senates the passage of house bill 812 on second reading, all in favorable vote Aye the oppose vote no, the second realise the recording crerk will record the votes we are deserving having any volunteer in any [xx] 812 passes the second reading of that objection be read a third time. North Carolina general assembly act. Do you have any other discussion or debate? Hearing no other request for the Senators' passage of House Bill 812 on its third reading on paper, say aye those oppose no. The ayes have it, House Bill, 812 passes it's 3rd reading it will be enrolled and send to the Governor. House Bill 836, the Clerk will read. House Bill 836, Election Modifications. Senator Brock is recognized to speak to the bill. Thank you Mr. President. senate, the election magnification this year has a few changes one is that they often take ballot can be sent by Accounting Board through electronic notification rather than mail or US mail. They are authorizing the new technology for paper balance and also to exchange the term to implement required for the paper ballot that we were we put the legislation last year, we know that that we can get more usage out of these machines for another years and also louse on accounting to pull the money to make sure that you can get this by the usage of these machines for the next couple of years to 2019 and to authorize, also the last part of legislation is to authorize trade[sp?] municipalities to conduct more beverage and unfortified wine elections which is I think of towns of 500 where you've had most of the, in the county that have had malt elections before and most of the towns have ABC permit, but to go into a further explanation of the paper ballots for the machines, this will create an actual paper ballot. Currently, and I'll use my county as an example, in Davie, use touch screen, like any type of tablet, iPad that you touch and you have your votes that are recorded. Where they're printed is on a spool of paper down in the lower corner that it's really tough to see if the name that you printed is on that printed receipt, but you don't get the receipt you really don't get see it because it rotates very quickly, your vote is actually kept on a key flop in this there is a lot of security issues with it also a lot of questions that people wonder if their votes are actually being cast away they wanted to I know we find some problems in the past which both relation will be very quick to respond and both sides where people are meant to vote for one party or one person is required to vote of the some of those have been curbed, but what we'll do with the new technology new machine is that when you print your ballot that you want to vote you will actually get a hard copy about to submit to those [xx] some of the other counties have a kind of a scan can sheet which I think most counties use right now that way you can see your ballot and you did vote for the people that you intended to vote for and if it was a mistake you can turn that into the elections official and that wip be But it will be cast out and you can cast your vote again in the same process to make sure that you vote for cast in a good way, I think we talked about this we worked at it I think it's a better way it's also a more secure way to vote to make sure that actual ballots that are printed or once that people will actually receive their ballot and who they voted for before it was recorded electronically and that's of security measure or someone trying to hack into the system or some way to interfere with voting process and I have had too many objections to that because I think it creates to secure a way Senator Brian has an amendment and I'll answer any questions. Thank you. Further discussion of the debate, Senator Brian fir what purpose you rise? To send forth an amendment Mr. President To send forth an amendment corporal read Senator Brian moves to amend the bill Senator Brian is recognised to speak to the amendment. Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate this bill just provides that during the first four days I think it is of early voting during which you can still submit an application for an absentee ballot you put some reason a person presents to the early voting and is not able to comply with government issue photo id requirements but
they do comply or can comply with the requirements for an application for an absentee ballot but they be notified that they have the option to apply for an absentee ballot and be informed and given that form and the ability to fill it out up to them to do that but at least we are putting them on an equal plain field with the absentee [xx] voters during those first four days I appreciate your support and I think the bill sponsors are agreeable to it thank you. Senator Block for what purpose do you rise? Speak to the amendment You have the floor senator. Thank you Mr president we have looked at the amendment and looks to be pretty good and allows people chance to cast their votes I urge everybody to support the amendment, Any further discussion or debate? Hearing none the question before the senate is the adoption of amendment one all in favor vote aye, oppose will vote no. Five seconds be allowed for the voting the clerk will record the vote. 47 having voted on the affirmative and zero in the negative this senate committee substitute comes amendment one is adopted the bill amended is back before the body do we any further discussion or debate on the bill? On this present. Senator Davis. Want to see the bill sponsor. Senator Burke will yield. Senator Broke was looking at the changes to the alcohol beverage election and my understanding correctly that this law is the proper violation and guess what the intent of the ability for other municiplaities to move forward it will and I think it is such a way that it says in the county which is more than 50% of the area of family corporal limits or has such an election and most of this areas already have, this way you may have a large county with several small towns and most of the small towns already have it, this will allow towns and 200 or more in that county to have am election thank you. Any further discussion or debate? Hearing none the question for the senate is passage of senate committee substitute the house bill 830 six have been amended on it's second reading on favor will vote aye, opposed will vote no, five seconds be allowed for the voting the clerk will record the vote Beringer, I 46 having voted in the affirmative and one in the negative, Senate Committee Substitute House Bill 836 as amended passes its second reading without objection be read for a third time. North Carolina general assembly act. Further discussion or debate? Hearing none the question for the senate passage of committee substitute house bill for 836 has amended on its third reading, all in favor Aye, opposed no, the Aye's have it senate bill substitute, house bill substitute as the amendment passes this 3rd Reading, the Amendment will be engrossed and will be send to the House for a concurrence in the Senate Committee Substitute. We have several in-currencies coming up here, senate bill 7, senator Apaca, for what purposes do you rise? All multiple motions. Senator Apodaca has the floor for the motions. Thank you Mr. President. House PCS SB 716 was sent by special messenger to the Senate today, move rule to be suspended to the end that it be read during session today and placed on the today's calendar for concurrence vote. Without objections so ordered, thanks Mr. President, the house bill 144 towns and authorities state health plans presently has a seal for the opinion on retirements made this serial with follow B removed and be brought to the floor Monday night. Without objection so ordered. Thank you Mr. President. to the motion to roll today's calendar SB 336 is up for concurrence, it has to be removed from today's calendar and sent to the Committee on Rules and Operations on zonic. Without objections so ordered. Thank you Mr. President, simple with the committee report and order. You can sign forward your committee report without order senator The Clerk will read. Senator Apodaca, Reinsurance Committee submits for passage house bill 154 Committee Substitute Number one, Unfavorable as to is substitute bill number one, with favor has to say senate bill number one, committee substitute bill title local government and state health plan house 148, committee substitute number one insurance required for more
parts favorable. House bill 154 inventive to managing house bill 148 calendar. Messages form the house Senate Bill 716 the clerk will read Senate Bill 716 house committee substitute and enact one direct North Carolina you till this commission to lead an expanded decision, under certain conditions on applications for certificate of public conveyance and necessity for an applicant to conscrapt generating facilities that they are using in that for gas is a primary fuel until modify certain requirements on the coal ash management act of 2014 for local coal ash surface and pond this located on sites is what all coal fire generating units present on those sites will be permanently cease operation by January 31st, 2020. Receive co-current house committee, sub Senator Apodaca. What? You are on the move to put that on the end of the calendar today. Yes sir, or we can do it now, either way. I will senate bill 716 we'll be placed at the end of the calendar today. Senate bill seven the clerk will read. Senate bill seven food stands sitting in outdoor food service. Senator Apodaca recognised Thank you Mr. President, members many mornings when Senator Lara and I go biking we like to stop back and take a look at convenience store for toto biscuits and many times we have to stay in because we are not allowed to have seats this is Senator Tillman bill back from the house and they emerged it with senator Hartsell, hamburger bill at baseball games so two great things in life I ask for your support support of this motion to conquer. Do we have any discussion or debate on the motion? Hearing none the the question before the senate is a motion to conquer in the house committee substitute the senate bill 7 all in favor will vote aye, oppose will vote no five second be allowed for the voting, clerk will record the vote. Suecsheck aye, Brain aye, 47 having voted in the affirmative and Zero in the negative the senate conquer and the house committee substitute senate bill 7 will be enrolled and sent to the governor. Senate bill 488 clerk will read. Senate bill 488 a man in uniform in the state family support act. Senator Pate is recognized to speak to the motion. Thank you Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen of the senate senate bill 488 pass the senate 49 to nothing and will sent over to the house, in the house they included some language from another Senate bill 489 which also has a companion bill in House Bill 297.489 is a bill that makes some changes to the administration of the states child support services office which is associated of course with the main title of this bill, and so I believe that the house made a good bill, a better bill and I'd urge that we approve Mr. President that we concurred with the house committee substitute. Senator Paige as you concur to any discussion or debate. Hearing none the question before the senator is the motion to concur the house committee substitute Senate Bill 488, all in favor vote aye, opposed will vote no. Five seconds will be allowed for the voting. Clerk will record the vote. 47 having voted in the affirmative and zero in the negative. The senate concurs in the house committee substitute Senate Bill 488, it will be enrolled and sent to the governor. Senate Bill 716 clerk will read. Senate 716 [xx] act 2015. Senator Apodaca is recognized to speak to the motion. Thank you Mr. President, members this bill is back before us, this is the expedited process to combat the actual power plan from coal to natural gas, the House added one additional requirement that notice for a public hearing under the expedited process for [xx] to build the facility and that will be done by the Utilities Commission, and put out to the public in Buncombe for hearing on the conversion of the plan. I ask that you support the motion. Senator Apodaca as you
concur, do we've any discussion or debate? Hearing none the question before the Senate is the motion to concur in House Committee to Senate Bill 716, all in favor will vote aye, oppose will vote no, 5 seconds to be allowed for the voting. Clerk will record the vote 47 having voted the informative and 0 in the negative, the Senate concurs in the House Committee Substitute Senate Bill it will be enrolled and sent to the governor. And that wraps up our calendar for the day they will be, this time I would like to say thanks to our pages we saw last time [xx] of the senate pages, thanks very much for serving us in the senate I was big help to us we hope everything would be of benefit to you when you come this year, thanks so much. We have the notices for announcements. [xx] above is your eyes Thank you [xx] an announcement this is to remind they when [xx] would focus on the daily minutes I have to end the session any other notices or announcements, any further business come for the senate not the chair recognises Senator Berger for motion Thank you Mr. President, just a short statement before I get to the motion. Our members we're going to move to adjourn until 1:30 Monday, the 1:30 is an administrative is for administrative reasons we will not have any votes until seven o'clock sessions. So with that Mr. President senate do now adjourn subject to the standard stipulation set forth in senate rule 24.1 the receipt of committee reports the appointment of conferees ratification of bills and will receive house messages to reconvene on Monday June 15th 2015 at 1:30 P. M. The Mrs. Senator now adjourns subject to stipulation senate by Senator Burger to reconvene Monday June 15th at 1:30 P. M. Seconded by Senator Blue. All in favour say, I opposed no the ayes have it, the senate stands adjourned.